Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority - CathNews New Zealand https://cathnews.co.nz Catholic News New Zealand Thu, 02 Aug 2018 20:17:27 +0000 en-NZ hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 https://cathnews.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/cropped-cathnewsfavicon-32x32.jpg Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority - CathNews New Zealand https://cathnews.co.nz 32 32 70145804 Church loses lawsuit over Christmas advertising https://cathnews.co.nz/2018/08/02/church-lawsuit-metro-advertising/ Thu, 02 Aug 2018 08:06:49 +0000 https://cathnews.co.nz/?p=109984

The Church has lost a lawsuit challenging the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's (WMATAs) advertising policies. The lawsuit was lodged last year by the Washington Archdiocese after the transit company rejected the Christmas advertisement (ad) the Archdiocese wanted to put on a bus. The ad showed silhouetted images of the three wise men and a Read more

Church loses lawsuit over Christmas advertising... Read more]]>
The Church has lost a lawsuit challenging the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's (WMATAs) advertising policies.

The lawsuit was lodged last year by the Washington Archdiocese after the transit company rejected the Christmas advertisement (ad) the Archdiocese wanted to put on a bus.

The ad showed silhouetted images of the three wise men and a message to "find the perfect gift" in the Catholic church.

The WMATA said the ad violated the First Amendment and pointed to its policy and guidelines about issue-oriented ads, where political, religious and advocacy ads are all banned.

Guideline 12 specifically bars ads that "promote or oppose any religion, religious practice, or belief."

Challenging this perspective, the Archdiocese said guideline 12 violated the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

It asked that WMATA accept the ad and requested the court reject key portions of the company's ban on issue-oriented ads.

The judge's decision was in favour of the transport company: "WMATAs advertising space is a non-public forum," and therefore the First Amendment argument does not apply.

At the same time, the judge said so long as WMATA rejects ads from or against all religions (and groups espousing secularism), the company's decision is not a violation of the First Amendment.

The WMATA policies were implemented after an Islamophobic activist submitted an ad that showed an image of the prophet Muhammad.

Source

Church loses lawsuit over Christmas advertising]]>
109984