Giles Fraser - CathNews New Zealand https://cathnews.co.nz Catholic News New Zealand Sun, 24 Nov 2013 00:23:45 +0000 en-NZ hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 https://cathnews.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/cropped-cathnewsfavicon-32x32.jpg Giles Fraser - CathNews New Zealand https://cathnews.co.nz 32 32 70145804 Doctor Who avoids modern scepticism, unlike Christianity https://cathnews.co.nz/2013/11/26/doctor-avoids-modern-scepticism-unlike-christianity/ Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:10:14 +0000 http://cathnews.co.nz/?p=52484

I am fascinated by how Doctor Who slips under the radar of contemporary scepticism in a way that Christianity doesn't. Perhaps its simply because it doesn't assert itself as being true. The Bible is extremely weird in places: monsters with horns on their horns, men wrestling with angels, devils entering pigs, floods covering the whole Earth, people Read more

Doctor Who avoids modern scepticism, unlike Christianity... Read more]]>
I am fascinated by how Doctor Who slips under the radar of contemporary scepticism in a way that Christianity doesn't. Perhaps its simply because it doesn't assert itself as being true.

The Bible is extremely weird in places: monsters with horns on their horns, men wrestling with angels, devils entering pigs, floods covering the whole Earth, people rising from the dead. For some, this weirdness is its very weakness.

Such stuff obviously couldn't have really happened. It's just fiction, they scoff angrily, dismissing the whole thing as rubbish. But I often find the weird bits the best.

Why can't the imagination be used to tell the truth - maybe not empirical truth, but something else. A truth about the human condition perhaps.

Saturday is the 50th anniversary of Doctor Who. And tonight's birthday show, The Day of the Doctor, continues the story of a man/god (a deus homo, in Anselm's words), aided by various companions, all seeking to save humanity from various dark catastrophes - often from those sinister religious fundamentalists, the Daleks, and their cult of Skaro. Continue reading.

Giles Fraser is priest-in-charge at St Mary's Newington in south London and the former canon chancellor of St Paul's Cathedral.

Source: Loose Canon, The Guardian

Image: The Guardian

 

Doctor Who avoids modern scepticism, unlike Christianity]]>
52484
For once, Richard Dawkins is lost for words https://cathnews.co.nz/2012/02/17/for-once-richard-dawkins-is-lost-for-words/ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:31:17 +0000 http://cathnews.co.nz/?p=19256

Atheists' arrogance is their Achilles' heel, as a cringemaking radio performance has proved. Which of us hasn't groaned when the Rev Giles Fraser, former canon of St Paul's, pops up with his Thought for the Day on Radio 4? Dr Fraser is the archetypal 21st-century vicar, as predictably Lefty as he is drearily on-trend. That Read more

For once, Richard Dawkins is lost for words... Read more]]>
Atheists' arrogance is their Achilles' heel, as a cringemaking radio performance has proved.

Which of us hasn't groaned when the Rev Giles Fraser, former canon of St Paul's, pops up with his Thought for the Day on Radio 4? Dr Fraser is the archetypal 21st-century vicar, as predictably Lefty as he is drearily on-trend. That "former" prefix is because, you'll recall, he resigned after welcoming the Occupy protesters to his cathedral. And since leaving St Paul's he has, in a form of caricature made flesh, become a Guardian leader writer. But I take it all back. Giles Fraser, you are now my hero.

In a discussion on the Today programme yesterday, Dr Fraser skewered the atheist campaigner Richard Dawkins so fabulously, so stylishly, and so thoroughly that anti-religion's high priest was reduced to incoherent mumbling and spluttering.

The two men were debating some new figures produced by Prof Dawkins's think tank, the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. (A typical Dawkins touch: not just any old Foundation for Reason and Science but the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science.) The statistics purport to show that most people who identify themselves as Christian turn out, when questioned on what they actually think, to be "overwhelmingly secular in their attitudes on issues ranging from gay rights to religion in public life". Dawkins's conclusion is that these self-identified Christians are "not really Christian at all".

If you were trying to come up with a definition of misplaced intellectual arrogance, you could not do better than having the planet's most famous atheist issuing diktats on who does and doesn't count as a proper Christian. Prof Dawkins then announced, triumphantly, that an "astonishing number [of Christians] couldn't identify the first book in the New Testament".

The transcript of the next minute or so only hints at how cringingly, embarrassingly bad it was for Dawkins.

Fraser: Richard, if I said to you what is the full title of The Origin Of Species, I'm sure you could tell me that.

Dawkins: Yes I could.

Fraser: Go on then.

Dawkins: On the Origin of Species…Uh…With, oh, God, On the Origin of Species. There is a sub-title with respect to the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life.

It was a golden minute of radio. But as well as being hilarious, it was hugely symbolic. In The Daily Telegraph yesterday, Baroness Warsi highlighted the militant secularism on the march in Britain. But as Dr Fraser revealed, the atheist army is led by an embarrassingly feeble general. The arrogance and intolerance of the atheists, exemplified by Prof Dawkins, is their Achilles' heel. Read more

Sources

 

For once, Richard Dawkins is lost for words]]>
19256